Showing posts with label robert dow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label robert dow. Show all posts

Sunday, July 2, 2017

The TransLink Fare Review Taskforce and the Pathway to the Introduction of Concessions Fares

By Michael Swifte, Page Manager, The Translink Ripoff


Introduction

Shortly before concession fares were brought in on April 3 we produced a briefing document outlining the failure of community consultation and consistent lack of accountability from the current Labor state government in regards to the process of fulfilling their election commitment to introducing concession fares for low income earners (which we managed to gain from Jackie Trad at a public meeting). The entire briefing which was shared with media and community services professionals has been published here for anyone who's interested in what the media and the advocacy groups ignored. 


Labor Policy Platform 2014

7.60 Labor will maintain public transport concessions and extend them to recipients of the Newstart allowance.”



Policy on the 2015 Election Trail

Jackie Trad promised us on 3 separate occasions that she would provide written commitments during the 2015 state election campaign including her party's commitments to extending concession fares to unemployed/Health Care Card holders. No written statements were issued.

Video: Michael Swifte seeking confirmation during 2015 election Politics in the Pub/Meet the candidates. In the video Jackie Trad reaffirms Queensland Labor's 2014 Policy Platform and acknowledges her party's commitment to introducing concession fares for unemployed/Health care Card holders. In the video she offers a meeting to The Translink Ripoff.

Pinned Post on our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/TTRipoff/


Our Case for Reform in early 2015­

In anticipation of our meeting with Jackie Trad, Tony Corbett secured an op-ed in The Courier Mail which is an abridged version of the ministerial brief presented ahead of our meeting.


MINISTERIAL BRIEF: THIS IS OUR AGENDA FOR REFORM


Commuting HCC Concessions and Burying the Fairer Fares Community Engagement

In our meeting with Jackie Trad she agreed with almost all our arguments regarding root and branch reform. Shortly after the meeting the premier issued her 'Ministerial Charter Letters' which were leaked to the media. In the charter letter to Jackie Trad there was no mention of introducing concessions for unemployed/Health Care Card holders. Thus it seemed HCC concessions were being passed over to the upcoming fare review. The below link contains the text of the charter letter.


In an interview on 612 ABC, June 22, 2015 Jackie Trad was asked why she couldn't reform concession fares policy now and bring Queensland into line with all other mainland states and territories and this was her response.

"Well we could but actually we have to have a look at some of the metrics around it"


Jackie Trad was transport minister when the fare review taskforce was announced. She promised extensive community engagement. Not only did her government not engage extensively with the public they also did this after making their decisions and taking them to budget. Here's a quote from then transport minister Jackie Trad in a statement announcing the appointment of a Fare Review Taskforce.

We will also engage extensively with the public, providing them with the opportunity to have their say before making a decision about the future of public transport fares in South East Queensland.”


Fare Review – Terms of Reference includes 'consideration' of concession fares.

The scope includes consideration of: products, ticket types including concession classes.”

"The taskforce will develop a detailed options paper for public consultation.”

“Following on from public consultation recommendations will be submitted to government."


In February 2016 Stirling Hinchliffe released a statement titled: 'Statement on the Independent Fare Review'. In it he promised that:

The review is expected to be handed down in the first half of this year and will be followed by extensive community consultation.”


The terms of reference were breached when the Taskforce Report, Government Response, and Community Engagement online 10 question survey were launched all at once with no “detailed options paper” presented for the promised “extensive community engagement”. The quote below is from the June 12, 2016 ministerial statement announcing the outcomes of the Fare Review.

For more information about the fare change online, you can view:
Government Response https://haveyoursay.translink.com.au/SEQ-Fare-Review/documents/37379/download(external site)
Fare Calculator http://jp.translink.com.au/fare-review (external site)Taskforce report (external site)
For more information about the fare reform or to have your say, visit the https://haveyoursay.translink.com.au/SEQ-Fare-Review (external site)”

Below is the June 12, 2016 ministerial statement announcing the completion of the fare review. In it the time frame offered for the introduction of concession fares is listed as “from early 2017”:

Concessions for Queensland job seekers: TransLink will work with Federal Agencies so jobseekers on Newstart or Youth Allowance will be able to access concession fares from early 2017. Concession fares for asylum seekers: In line with other states like New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT, asylum seekers in Queensland will be able to access concession fares to use public transport from early 2017.”


The Fare Review Taskforce Report, released on June 12, 2016 indicates that an “options paper” will be released. This aligns with the Terms of Reference, but no options paper ever appeared.

Following consideration of the SEQ Fare Review Taskforce’s Options Paper, the Queensland Government will also engage extensively with the public, providing them with the opportunity to have their say before making a decision about the future of public transport fares in South East Queensland.”


Government fare review reforms were sent to budget on June 14, 2 days after the Taskforce Report, Government Response, and community engagement online survey were released.

An ABC article from June 14, 2016 shows the figure that will be taken to budget to cover the cost of fare and zone reforms.

$210 million in public transport revenue to be foregone to fund new zone and fare structure in south-east Queensland”


Basic information about the reforms taken to budget.


On September 5, 2016 the Fairer Fares Community Engagement Report was released with zero notification to the public through social media and minimal meta data listed on the downloadable PDF. There was one unreported mention of the community engagement outcomes in Hansard, but no ministerial statement.

The community feedback on these changes has been overwhelmingly positive. During the consultation period, there were 30,756 visits to the Fairer Fares web page on the TransLink website, with 3,555 customers providing direct feedback via a 10-question survey to inform future fare planning.”


Our private correspondence with Translink Customer Relations/External Affairs revealed the dates of the only attempts to communicate the results of the community engagement process.

Text of email from Jesse at TransLink Customer Relations, 10/01/17:

On Wednesday 31 August 2016, the Hon Stirling Hinchliffe, Minister for Transport and the Commonwealth Games, made a statement to the Queensland Parliament on the outcomes of the feedback process. A summary of the feedback from the community was provided in the Fairer Fares Community Engagement Report, which was released to the public via the Fare Review website on Monday 5 September 2016. A copy of the report is attached for your reference.”


We questioned Taskforce member and public transport users advocate Robert Dow who acknowledged that he “stumbled” on the community engagement report and was not sent the report. We suspect that no member of the Taskforce was alerted to the release of the community engagement report.

Here are 2 quotes from Robert Dow tweets (@Robert_Dow) regarding the discovery of the Fairer Fares Community Engagement Report roughly 3 months after it's release, December 8, 2016:

@TransFixSEQ I stumbled on it last week!”

@TransFixSEQ...They did not even tell the fare review task force!”


Here is a link to the web page where the Fairer Fares Community Engagement Report can be downloaded:


On December 14, 2016 it was announced that the Fairer Fares package of reforms would be brought forward to December 19 with no concessions to be brought in until an unspecified time “in 2017”.

Concessions for Queensland job seekers: TransLink will work with Federal Agencies so jobseekers on Newstart or Youth Allowance will be able to access concession fares in 2017.”

Concession fares for asylum seekers: In line with other states like New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT, asylum seekers in Queensland will be able to access concession fares to use public transport in 2017.”


A January 25, 2017 update from Mark Henley, CEO of the Queensland Council of Social Service (QCOSS) indicates that in “mid 2017” we may see concession fares. This means that the most important decisions and design elements are likely being set in place as I write.

Our most recent communication with the Department of Transport is that the transport concessions for job seekers and asylum seekers is more likely to be implemented mid-2017 rather than early.”



Advocacy from QCOSS?

Our fare comparison table features in this QCOSS Transport Disadvantage forum report from August 2011.



Mark Henley from QCOSS has only ever provided what we would describe as a soft message for the state government on concession fares. At each stage he has indicated support for the introduction of concession fares but has not sought to hold the government to a timetable and has not articulated any need for an open and accountable process.

The section titled 'Better Targeted Concessions' in the QCOSS 2016/17 Pre Budget Submission includes this statement:

"QCOSS believes that a review of the level and targeting of concessions for people on low incomes in Queensland would identify a range of opportunities to most effectively use the concession spend. This might include concessions for people on low incomes who use public transport"

QCOSS 2016/17 Pre Budget Submission:


In a June 13, 2016 media release from titled 'Job seekers and asylum seekers on the move with concessions announced' QCOSS made the statement:

We look forward to continuing to work with government throughout the implementation of this initiative and seeing these concessions applied across the state,”


Hansard from June 15, 2016 contains this statement from Labor MP Curtis Pitt attributing a supportive position to Mark Henley and QCOSS:

Mark Henley from the Queensland Council of Social Service says there are some good things in the state budget. He says the decision about transport concessions for jobseekers and asylum seekers is good news.”


No submission was made by QCOSS to the Fare Review Taskforce and we gather from our January 18 meeting with Mark Henley and Kamil Shah, and through subsequent email exchanges, that if any communication took place before or during the fare review, the only item communicated was the existence of a 2013 QCOSS submission titled 'Review of public transport fares for the TransLink public transport network in South East Queensland' suggesting a fare review.

Below is a quote from our private correspondence after our meeting:

It is my understanding there was not an additional submission prepared. I know we made sure they had access to the 2013 submission. To be honest I don’t recall whether there was an opportunity to provide written submissions at the time.”

Below is a link to the previously mentioned 2013 QCOSS submission to the Queensland government. It was prepared with the help of Rail Back on Track, Council of the Ageing (COTA) and the Multicultural Development Association (MDA). It contains some excellent arguments for bringing in concession fares and provides some useful case studies to explain some of the challenging circumstances of low income earners in accessing public transport. An updated version of this report would have served the taskforce well in their deliberations.



Jackie Trad and her allies

Queensland Community Alliance along with the Multi-Cultural Development Association, the Rail Tram and Bus Union and the Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane successfully lobbied both Jackie Trad and Stirling Hinchliffe for the extention of concession fares to asylum seekers. Below is a link to the online petition hosted by Queensland Community Alliance and a link to Jackie Trad's Ministerial Diary for December 2015 indicating that a December 3, 2015 meeting was held.



On June 12, 2016 Jackie Trad wrote the below quote in a post on her Facebook page, at this stage she was no longer transport minister. In the accompanying poster Labor claims concessions for “asylum seekers” and “job seekers” as part of “Public Transport Reforms” that “#LaborDelivers”. Jackie Trad copied Queensland Community Alliance into the post. The message in the poster and particularly the #LaborDelivers hashtag is an assertion that change has been delivered. The reality at the time this Facebook post was being viewed, and at the time of writing (13/03/17) was that none of the “promised” policy on concession fares had been delivered. We could not find the poster art or #LaborDelivers messaging outside the Facebook silo.

Worked hard as shadow transport minister to have developed & promised this policy. Proud to have delivered it in Government. #LaborDelivers Queensland Community Alliance”


Community Alliance welcomes the concessions for asylum seekers promised at the announcement of the Fairer Fares Package.

The Queensland Community Alliance welcomes the Queensland Government's announcement that they will extend public transport concessional fares to asylum seekers. Alliance leaders Kerrin Benson, Archbishop Mark Coleridge and Owen Doogan have all indicated their support for this announcement.”


Thursday, March 17, 2016

Qld Local Elections: The BCC Public Transport Policy Mosh Pit


By Tony Corbett


Its hard to know where to start with the public transport (PT) policy mosh-pit that has characterised the BCC election campaign.  There isn’t much point getting into the nitty gritty, we’ll leave that to Brizcommuter who provides a good assessment HERE. At a broader level the PT promise frenzy the mayoral candidates have engaged in tell us that the toxic relationship and blurred lines of responsibility between the BCC and the state government continues to cripple our PT system and stymie any improvement.

The two main candidates, the LNPs Graham Quirk and Labor’s Rod Harding have promised half baked, expensive metro and light rail systems with zero discussions with the state via Translink, who is allegedly responsible for PT.  Harding has also promised ‘free fare Fridays’ when the BCC actually, nominally, has no control over fares.  The ludicrousness of this proposal prompted Rail Back on Track’s Bob Dow to publicly call for legislation stripping the BCC of any control over public transport.  Both of the major parties were silent on cross river rail, the number 1 priority to get the city moving. The Greens candidate Ben Pennings has made some cheaper bus-based proposals, which are OK if taken in isolation, but that is what we believe is the critical point.  All of the promises and proposals have been rushed and developed in isolation, with little or no thought of system integration.

Meanwhile we have a new transport minister at state level, SH, who on early indications seems as useless and hamstrung as his predecessor Jackie Trad.  The vaunted fare review has supposedly been completed (?), but with no public consultation, no release date, ad hoc releases of more special fare products, and if the BCC election campaign promises are anything to go by, lukewarm or zero political support.

Brisbane’s public transport system remains woefully inadequate, with no indications of reform or improvement in the future.  None of the players at state or BCC levels seem to understand or care that political and institutional reform is the only way forward.  While they don’t seem to understand, they actually do understand.  What seem to us like a murky, opaque web of backroom deals between politicians and unions, and between state and BCC politicians combines to maintain the status quo of an unintegrated system that is expensive to use and run and stuck in time somewhere around Expo 88.

The state leaving PT to the BCC has had disasterous results.  The BCC only has control over buses, and inevitably they have delivered us to ‘peak bus’.  A single, state government controlled metro controlling all aspects of the system, with a focus on rail is the only way forward.  If the BCC genuinely cared about delivering good public transport it would recognise the need for integrating rail and bus modes.  For that to happen the BCC needs to stop acting unilaterally on major infrastructure and the state needs to prioritise PT and get on the front foot politically.  In other words, the BCC needs to step aside, and the state needs to step up.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Our Meeting with the new Transport Minister and Setting the Agenda

On March the 6th we met with new Transport Minister Jackie Trad. We thank her for taking time to meet us, a grass-roots protest group, and hear our concerns. We told her public transport in South East Queensland is woefully inadequate and needs major reform. This won’t be easy and requires vision and commitment.

We strongly reiterated our key concerns which included concessions for low income Health Care Card (HCC) holders, abolishing the Tertiary Transport Concession Card (TTCC), fare and zone reform, organisational reform of the three existing bureaucracies (Queensland Rail, Brisbane Transport and Translink), and removal of existing public transport planning powers from Brisbane City Council.

The minister reconfirmed her stated election position, including fare reform, abolishing the TTCC and concessions for HCC holders, but she could not yet provide specific time frames. She took our views on board regarding the parlous state of SEQ PT and the need for reform. Importantly, she agreed to meet us again in six months.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/opinion/opinion-brisbane-cant-be-world-class-without-an-efficient-affordable-and-accessible-public-transport-system/story-fnihsr9v-1227260384517


A week later we were pleased to find our opinion piece based on our briefing to the minister had been published in the Courier Mail, the first time our name has ever been mentioned in that paper. We feel the response has been positive and that some more engaging conversations will happen in the coming months.

We understand that this Labor government has it's work cut out, but we feel that much can be done by our new transport minister to engage with the court of public opinion. This is where we will be drumming up some visions for the future based on what the people want and asking Jackie Trad to share more about how our system really works so that the public can make an informed contribution.

Monday, March 2, 2015

MINISTERIAL BRIEF: THIS IS OUR AGENDA FOR REFORM

Ministerial Brief

To: The Hon Jackie Trad MP, Deputy Premier and Minister for Transport, Minister for Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning and Minister for Trade

By: The Translink Ripoff, March 2015

PURPOSE

The Purpose of the meeting is to discuss the current status of, and a reform agenda for public transport in south-east Queensland.

BACKGROUND/ VISION

What do the great cities of the world have in common? Efficient, affordable, easy-to-use public transport (PT) systems. We envisage a world-class SEQ PT system that is integral to the social and economic fabric of the region that people feel good about using.

The reality is that our PT system is woefully inadequate, expensive, not easy to use and needs complete reform to begin to drag it towards world best practice. Currently, it is a transport mode of last resort.

Why is Brisbane PT so inadequate and expensive in comparison to other Australian and international cities? (It’s not density. Perth, for example, has similar densities).

Decades of underdevelopment, neglect and corruption under the Country/ National Party of Premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen meant that the Goss Government had a huge reform task when elected in 1989. Also Brisbane’s low-density and low population meant that traffic congestion arrived later than elsewhere. The size of the reform task combined with the unique huge local government which had administrative control of buses in a bus-dominated system, meant that PT was not prioritised by the State and left largely to the BCC. This situation has continued for far too long.

Public transport policy inertia during a time of rapid population growth has resulted in a 1990s transport system for a city that purports to be ‘world-class’.

We acknowledge and are encouraged by the Transport Minister’s stated commitment to introducing concession fares for Health Care Card holders, abolishing the TTCC and duplicating the Sunshine Coast rail line. However, these measures, while vitally important, are only ‘playing catch-up’ and addressing individual aspects of a system in need of root-and-branch reform.

SEQ PT system reform would commence with a broad inquiry with authentic community consultation which would inform the process. Reform would include organisational restructuring and cultural change, new key infrastructure components, greater emphasis on rail and light rail rather than buses, fare reform and greater coordination between rail and bus modes. This task won’t be easy, and requires a visionary Transport Minister and government who can see Brisbane as a world class city with a world class PT system. PT system reform undertaken by former WA Transport Minister Alannah McTiernan during the previous decade, which included streamlining the bureaucracy into the single TransPerth entity and constructing new and highly utilised train links, exists as evidence that it can be done.

The challenge for the state government is to reform SEQ PT into an affordable, efficient, fast, coordinated system that compares well with other affluent cities.
ISSUES

SEQ PT issues are many and varied and complex. These include but are not limited to:
  • Compares poorly with other cities: More expensive than anywhere else, and not as good as anywhere else (see our blog).
  • Too bus reliant, a unique feature of the system and a key reason for the high cost and poor quality. Buses will always be an integral component, but they are inefficient in terms of capacity and contributing to traffic congestion, particularly peak times in the CBD. (The Springfield and Redcliffe rail links and the GC light rail are steps in the right direction).
  • The only State capital without concessions for Health Care Card holders: High fares and no concession means low income earners must severely ration their PT use. In other words they can't afford to use it. Unemployed people can't canvass for employment, perform voluntary work or connect with friends and relatives. A human rights lawyer told us an anecdote about a junior basketball team of African immigrants who jogged across multiple suburbs to get to games because they could not afford bus fares. We spoke to an apprentice chef who is spending over half his income on train and bus fares. We could go on and on…
  • Poor community attitude toward SEQ PT: Very few people like our PT system. We have been out on the streets canvassing support for system reform and gauging community concerns for over three years, and living here for much longer. There is very little community support for, and indeed significant hostility toward, the Brisbane PT system. It is the transport mode of last resort.
  • Catching a taxi or buying an old car is often a better alternative: A taxi is usually a better option for 2 or more people. In other Australian cities this is the case for 3, 4 or 5 or more people. We often hear from people, and read in internet comments, that people believe it is cheaper and easier to buy and maintain an old car than to rely on PT. This has indeed been the experience of some TLR activists.
  • Tourists do not embrace our PT: Visitors from interstate or overseas are generally stunned at the high cost and poor quality of our PT. Moreover, Brisbanites who travel are amazed at how cheap and easy PT systems are to use in cities elsewhere.
  • The bureaucracy is fractured and cumbersome: BT and QR work in isolation and with hostility towards each other rather than cooperatively, and Translink doesn’t have the political or legal backing to adequately address this. We have three organisations where other cities have one. This is a core problem.
  • Real costs of sub-standard PT, (congestion, pollution, social isolation), are externalised; Any discussion of running costs occurs in isolation. For example in 2010 when the ALP government was promoting the ‘need’ for 80% fare increases over 5 years based on ‘the 75% subsidy’. This has to change to build political momentum for reform. The state government needs to view PT delivery as a core responsibility, like public safety, which delivers real environmental, social and economic benefits, not as a burden that has to be subsidised.
  • Generally not easy to use; unless you are a well-organised, regular user (It is difficult, for example, to find somewhere to recharge a Go Card after hours, and in many suburbs at any time of day).

Those who defend SEQ PT obfuscate and highlight specific services that work well for those that live near and use them, but this does not counter the reality of the inadequate and uncoordinated system as a whole. Moreover, Translink’s self-reviewed performance is designed and framed in ways that conceals this reality. (The contrast between Tranlink’s customer satisfaction reporting with the hundreds of comments from frustrated SEQ PT users under every media article on the topic is stark.)

There is no coherent SEQ PT vision or plan, or if there is, it hasn’t been/ isn’t being implemented. Historically governments either wouldn’t or couldn’t tackle the long-overdue task of reform and have instead resorted to ad hoc, reactive PT policy.

Examples and evidence of ad hoc policy include the non-alignment of zones across bus and rail modes (and generally complex zones), annual rolling 20% and 15% fare increases, the open-to-rorting 9-trips-then-free, the free Kangaroo Point ‘City Hopper’ ferry, the creation of special tourist fares, the TTCC and the CCR/ BAT as political football (see Appendix for more discussion of these policies).

RECOMMENDATIONS
A wide ranging SEQ PT inquiry or review that would include authentic community consultation and involve comparing costs, organisational structure, efficiencies and outcomes with other cities, (benchmarking) and consider the costs of having a sub-standard system and the benefits of having a good one. The inquiry would inform a reform process that would get Brisbane and SEQ moving, bring our PT up to a standard that compares well with other cities, and deliver huge social, environmental and economic benefits. Reforms would probably include:

  • Organisational/ Institutional reform to get the different arms, BT, QR and Translink, leaner and rowing in the same direction. We need an integrated public transport organisational structure, (BrisMetro?), with a transparent, cooperative and user-focused culture.
  • Commitment to undertake authentic community consultation to inform the SEQ PT inquiry and reform process.
  • More emphasis on rail and light-rail rather than buses; Brisbane’s bus-centric PT is unique and unsustainable for a city of its size and projected growth.
  • Rail or light rail links to new big residential developments; like Kurilpa Point and The Gap Cedar Woods mega-suburb. Developers will contribute to infrastructure costs. Adding a few more buses as is currently proposed won’t cut it.
  • Rationalising zones; most other cities haves 1 or 2 zones in an area where we have 7 or 8. Brisbane Zone 1 is 1.5km while Perth’s is 7km and Sydney and Melbourne’s are 10km. Also the bus and rail zones do not align.
  • Cross-River Rail that would feed into an underground inner-city loop; Urgently-needed infrastructure that would increase rail capacity and efficiency. An inner city loop would have stops at existing Central and Roma Street, as well as new CBD stations, and provide for future rail expansion.
  • Duplicating the Sunshine Coast line; Urgently-needed infrastructure that would revitalise the Sunshine Coast and connect it with SEQ, increase liveability, tourism and promote economic growth.
  • Fare reform; concession fares for health care card holders (like every other big Australian city), more flexible ticket options to enable people to save based on their usage patterns (like every other big Australian city). Lower fares across the board to increase usage, decrease congestion and pollution, and get our City moving.
SEQ PT is in desperate need of reform. Let’s get SEQ PT up to scratch and get our region moving.




Jackie Trad, Queensland Transport Minister as of February 2015



References

Unearthed 2004 Zone Map: What it shows us.

It's Election Time: Compare the State Capitals

http://ttripoff.blogspot.com.au/2015/01/its-election-time-compare-state-capitals.html
Bremner, D. 2009. ‘How Translink could engage the community to produce an equitable and future-focused fare structure.’ Masters Thesis, QUT http://www.scribd.com/doc/24740277/How-TransLink-could-engage-the-community-to-produce-an-equitable-and-future-focused-fare-structure#scribd
Brisbane commuters abandon buses, choose cars instead, Brisbane Times, 12/9/14
Kelly, J.F. and Donegan, P. 2015. City Limits: Why Australia’s cities are broken and how we can fix them, Melbourne University Press: Parkville.
Go card for visitors (SEEQ Card) - another TransLink fail!, http://brizcommuter.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/go-card-for-visitors-another-translink.html
McTiernan, Alannah, 2013. How the West was won: (Former WA Transport Minster’s powerpoint presentation on the benefits of public transport reform and investment over toll roads), http://trainsnottollroads.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Alannah-MacTiernan-Presentation-from-Trains-not-Toll-Roads-Launch-June-13-2013.pdf



Appendix: Examples and evidence of ad hoc PT policy

  • The zones. When the system was ‘integrated’ for ticketing purposes BT refused to consider zone reform. This is why there are so many zones in comparison to other cities and also why the bus and rail zones don’t align.
  • Annual, rolling 20%-15% fare increases commencing in 2010 for a total 80% fare increase planned by Labor over 5 years, effectively doubling fares. A knee-jerk response to falling revenues and increasing running costs that gave little or no consideration to system reform, how fares compared with other cities and the economic, social and environmental impacts of high fares and a poor system. This is the perennial Brisbane PT dog-chasing-its-tail dilemma; revenues fall because the system is inadequate and expensive to use, so governments increase fares, which causes patronage to fall again, and so it goes.
  • 10-trips-then-free; the 2012 11th hour ALP election promise, (which was subsequently trumped by the LNP’s 9-Trips). This was policy on the run, open to rorting, and tacit acknowledgment of the impact of, and people’s hostility to rolling annual fare increases and the highest fares in Australia.
  • The free ‘City Hopper’ cross- river Kangaroo Point ferry; While the vast majority of residents were paying the highest fares in Australia for sub-standard service, out of the blue the BCC establishes a FREE ferry for one select group of residents. We are yet to hear a satisfactory explanation for the existence of the City Hopper.
  • The creation of ‘special’ tourist fares: These have included the SEEQ Go Card, the Go Explore card for Gold Coast tourists and the G20 Go Card. These were proposed and developed is a result of tacit acknowledgment of and embarrassment about the high cost and poor quality of SEQ PT, and the potential to create a bad impression upon visitors.
  • The Tertiary Transport Concession Card (TTCC); an expression and result of misplaced paranoia about fare evasion. The TTCC was a solution in search of a problem that unnecessarily placed a significant administrative burden on students, tertiary institutions and government.
  • CRR/ BAT; the desperately-needed rail link as political football. (We believe CRR was/ is a good option within the given policy context, albeit undertaken at the 11th hour. The BAT was Simpsons ‘Springfield Monorail’-esque bad policy that would have further entrenched Brisbane’s unique and unsustainable bus-centrism).

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Why the bus cuts fell to pieces.

by Michael Swifte

 
Yarn bombed bus stop on Sarah St in Annerley.





When we first saw this photo posted to the Annerley Junction Annerley Arcade facebook page we knew we were witnessing a pivotal moment in the relationship between the people of Brisbane and their public transport providers. We've watched the public transport scene very closely over the past 2 years and have seen nothing online or elsewhere that showed such a positive and fierce response to the brutal strategies of Translink under successive governments. This image was shared widely on facebook and twitter, spawned newspaper stories and blog posts, and also made it onto local TV. This image/action helped to strengthen the resolve of  the many local groups who were lobbying their councilors to save their bus routes. It also led to the transport minister Scott Emerson handing over the Brisbane bus routes review process to the Brisbane City Council.

For many Brisbane bus users there is one route that is most important, it passes within a short walking distance of their house, and there are generally just enough services during peak times to get to and from work. They have an intimate knowledge of the small part of the network that they rely on, and they know the only other options available to them are infrequent, inconsistent, and much further to walk.  In the last 4 years Brisbane bus users have seen a 72.5% increase in fares, little improvement in service frequency, congestion on busways and in the CBD, and no improvement in buses arriving on time. So when Translink presented their review and suggested cuts the people clung to what they knew could be relied upon.

Most Brisbanites don't have time to analyse the latest political squabble or planning trend and are understandably suspicious of the transport minister's latest promises and spin. Most have a general understanding of their political representation and most know who is responsible for running the buses. It's not surprising then that in frustration at Translink they saw an opportunity to seek advocacy as constituents and rate payers. Brisbanites turned to their local councilor to defend what they knew worked for them. 

The handover of the reform of Brisbane bus networks to the BCC revealed in technicolor that Translink is at odds with its largest bus service provider. It also revealed that Translink had failed to consult effectively with the public. Planners and transit boffins decried the loss of Translink's new high frequency network plans,  but the people whose local buses were set to disappear were happy that they had retained that last sliver of convenience. In failing to effectively consult the people Translink failed to identify an important component of public transport provision that industry leaders call 'coverage' (not leaving huge unserviced gaps). They also failed to identify an important trait shown by people who have been beaten down and boxed into a corner - they rise up and fight back harder than ever!



 


Saturday, April 21, 2012

Let's talk about affordability

The information in this table was gathered from public transport websites for each mainland state capital in Australia. It gives an opportunity to compare the fares, ticketing, and zones for Translink against other transit authorities. Is Translink up to best practice?
   


Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Sunday, January 8, 2012

Notching up. It's growing! Mark my words!

The team were out the front of central station handing out our 'notching up' offer to commuters saying "The Translink Ripoff" and "We are being ripped off!". I lost count of how many times I heard "We sure are!".

Though we only got one taker for our offer we think it was a successful outing. Terry who lives in Lawnton will save $18 because of our notching service. He was not only happy to get a saving but stoked to see some active resistance against Translink's coercive strategies.

While I was on the busway notching up Terry's unregistered go-card I bumped into Andrew who lives at the Gold Coast and commutes to Brisbane daily. He said he had seen last weeks Brisbane Times article and had decided to have a go at notching his own card. We hopped buses for forty minutes together while I shared some of the finer points of notching. Andrew stands to make a significant saving for his efforts (roughly $90) saying that the time he took off work was worth it. Andrew will be sharing his experiences with the local Chinese language community online.

We are of the opinion that an enterprising young bicycle courier could earn a few bucks by offering a notching service.

Please like our Facebook page

Notching up your unregistered go-card

Today we have a very special offer. After receiving legal advice we've decided to make this offer available only for adults with unregistered go-cards. According to the Translink website go-card conditions of use " The go card must only be used by the authorised user or by the cardholder if no authorised user is nominated." 

Translink do not specify that the person who purchases a go-card retain proof of purchase so therefore an unregistered go-card is transferable between individuals, ie the card holder is any person holding that card. 

Here is how our offer works. TXT your first name and second initial, and your CBD work address to Michael on 0414 215 288 before 10am. Our team will 'notch up' 9 journey's and return your card to you at work between 2pm and 3pm. 

You will need at least $21.96 credit on your go-card to cover the 9 journey's. We are asking for $1 cash per journey. 

Numbers are limited so get in early!

Go unregistered!